A.P. Bhangale,J.

1. Rule. Counsel for the respective Respondents waive notice. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner-in-person claims that he is a Social Activist and takes up Social causes in public interest. He prays for a writ of mandamus against Respondent No.1, the Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred as ‘NMMC’ for short) for direction to cancel development permission (Exh.'N') given to Hotel Tunga Regency Private Limited, Vashi, the Respondent no. 4 herein (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tunga’ for short) and for the direction to City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra, the Respondent no. 2 (hereinafter referred as ‘CIDCO’ for short) to cancel the leave & license agreement at Exh. 'B' regarding allowing parking of the vehicles upon public parking plot no. 36-B and to hand over the said plot to NMMC, the Planning Authority, for public parking management and for direction to the State of Maharashtra to investigate the events leading to the grant of the permission (Exh. 'N'), issuance of letter (Exh. 'L') by CIDCO and prayed for appropriate action against the officials of the respondents nos. 1 to 3, responsible to