S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Sadashiv Krishna Sutar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, by consent.
2. Mrs. Mane, learned A.P.P., waives service on behalf of the Respondent-State.
3. A short question is raised in this Criminal Revision Application, which is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 24th July, 2012 of the Special Judge, Greater Bombay. This Judgment and Order was delivered on an application made by the present Applicant/Original Accused for discharge in Special Case No.45 of 2011.
4. The question raised for my consideration is whether the Applicant, who has been appointed as a Manager by the Liquidator of M/s. Indira Co-operative Bank Limited, is a “Public Servant” within the meaning of the said term, as defined in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, (for short “the P.C. Act”).
5. The undisputed factual position is that M/s. Indira Co-operative Bank Limited is under liquidation. In the year 1998, the District Registrar in exercise of his powers under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 has appointed a Liquidator of the said Co-operative Bank. During the course of the liquidation proceedings and to look after the same, the Liquidator made appointments, one of which was of the pre
S.S. Dhanoa Vs. Municipal Corporation, reported in 1981 (3) SCC 431 Shri. Tekraj Vasandi Vs. U.O.I.
Dnyandeo Dattatraya Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra
Mapusa Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. Vs. Dattatraya
Nandkumar Nivrutti Baptivale Vs. Automotive Research Association of India
Rama Krishna Sahu Vs. State of Orissa
State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Shri Ram Singh
Naresh Kumar Madan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Maharashtra Vs. Laljit Rajshi Shah & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.