SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Bom) 1188

BOMBAY HIGH COURT AT PANAJI, GOA
S.A. BOBDE AND N.A. BRITTO, JJ.
Shri Prakash Parab, Central Jail, Aguada
Shri Rupesh @ Topo Gawali
Shri Ramesh Jadav - Appellants
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 56 and 65 of 2003 and 8/2004
Decided on: 23rd August, 2004

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
D. Pangam. Advocate under Legal Aid Scheme, S.G. Dessai, Senior Advocate with Shivan Dessai. Advocate, for the appellant
Ms. W. Coutinho. Addl. Public Prosecutor, Ms. W. Coutinho. Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent.

Headnote:Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 3 - Motive. - Motive looses important where the case proved on other materials kept on record.

JUDGMENT

Per Britto, J.

These appeals have been filed by the accused in sessions case No. 30/2001. The said accused have been tried, convicted and sentenced by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge (1), Panaji, under Sections 302, 392 r/w Section 34, IPC by his judgment and order dated 31.7.2003.

2. A bare outline of the case of the prosecution is that the deceased Peter Pereira (Peter Uncle) aged about 55 years, was at the relevant time, residing alone in his house at Umtavado in Calangute, his two other brothers residing elsewhere in the Same ward. He was visited last by his son PW 3 Marcelino on 7.4.2001 at about 10 to 11 am along with his own son aged about three years. PW 3 Marcelino after having conversed with his said father Peter, went away. On the next day i.e. 8.4.2001 at about 3 pm one Sheila with another old lady went to see the deceased Peter. The said Sheila was one of the tenants of the deceased Peter and after having knocked at his door, found that there was no response, and they reported the matter to PW 5 Mumtaj and then they all reported the matter to the eldest daughter-in-law of the deceased and the latter informed PW 3 Marcelino to go to the house of Peter. PW 3 Marcelino then came to the house of the deceased Peter and found by seeing through the window that his father was lying on the bed in an awkward position with blood stains and also found that the clothes in the house were scattered all over. He tried to shout and wake up the deceased but that was of no use and then tried to push the door and found it locked from inside and therefore he took a ladder and entered the house through the roof and found that his father was cold with blood on his face and injury marks on his head. He also noticed the gold ornaments namely a chain, a pendant, two rings and a watch missing. PW 3 Marcelino was followed to the house by one of the brothers of the deceased, namely, PW 1 Alex who was informed by his nephew about the incident and who also saw his brother, the deceased, lying on the bed full of blood and he also saw that the torch which was being used by his brother, bent and with blood. He also found the gold ornaments worn by his deceased brother missing and therefore he proceeded to the Police Station where he lodged his complaint which was written down by PW 31 P.I. Shri Banaulikar who was then the Inspector-in-charge of the Calangute Police Station and who registered the same against unknown culprits under Sections 450, 302 and 392, IPC. Upon registering the said FIR PW 31 P.I. Banaulikar reached the scene accompanied by a dog squad, finger print expert and a photographer. He then prepared a scene of offence panchanama - Exh. PW 2/A, in support of which PW 2 Alex has been examined. PW 2 Alex apart from describing as to what he saw at the scene had particularly stated that in the room where the body was found there was blood seen on the walls. He produced the sketch prepared by P.I. Shri Banaulikar at Exh. PW 2/B. Shri Banaulikar also prepared an inquest panchanama which is supported by PW 2 Alex and thereafter sent the dead body for post mortem examination. It has been recorded in the scene of offence panchanama that the services of the dog squad and the finger print operator which were pressed into service did not give any clue. 25 photographs taken by the police photographer PW 21 Reginaldo have been produced at Exh. 76.

3. The post mortem examination of the dead body was conducted by PW 7 Dr. Sapeco on 9.4.2001 and the autopsy report has been produced by him at Exh. PW 7/B. Dr. Sapeco found on the person of the deceased about 11 external injuries which have been described by him on page 3 of his report. The said injuries were (i) A CLW with dried blood around the bridge of the nose: (ii) A CLW with dried blood around and between the eye brows; (iii) A CLW with dried blood around the left eye brow along inner 2/3rds. (iv) Bruise at frontal region of scalp beyond area between eye brows. (v) red bruises on the right





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top