S.J.KATHAWALLA
Ramesh Jairamdas Jaising – Appellant
Versus
Bansi Jairamdas Jaising – Respondent
1. One Ms. Jaiwantiben Jairam Jaising passed away on 26th January, 2002 (deceased”) leaving behind her last Will and Testament dated 13th December, 1997 (“the said will”). Respondent No. 1 – Bansi Jairamdas Jaising and his son Respondent No. 2 – Ravi Bansi Jaising were the executors appointed under the said will of the deceased. The present Petition is filed by one of the beneficiaries/legatees under the said Will seeking removal/discharge/suspension of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as executors of the said Will in view of the facts and circumstances more particularly set out in the Petition, for appointment of another executor in place and instead of Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and for other reliefs more particularly prayed for therein. Respondent Nos.3 to 6 are the beneficiaries / legatees under the said Will and are supporting the Petitioner.
2. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, Respondent No.1 – Bansi Jaising filed his affidavit dated 7th January, 2015, setting out details pertaining to the management of the estate of the deceased by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in their capacity as the executors of the last will. In the said affidavit, Respondent No. 1 – Bansi Jaising had stated
Attorney General v. Butterworth, (1963) 1 QB 696
Amicus Curiae vs. Ashok Khot and another
Advocate General, Bihar v. M. P. Khair Industries
Delhi Judicial Service Association v. State of Gujarat
Hira Lal Dixit v. State of U.P. AIR 1954 SC 743
R. L. Kapur v. State of Madras
Preetam Lal vs. High Court of M.P. Reported in AIR 1992 SC 904
Sukhdev Singh Sodhi v. The Chief Justice and Judges of the Pepsu High Court
State of Bombay v. P., (1958) 60 Bom LR 873 : (AIR 1959 Bom 192)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.