R.D.DHANUKA
Ajay Singh (Sunny) Deol – Appellant
Versus
Suneel Darshan – Respondent
1. By these two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short “the said Arbitration Act), both the petitioners have challenged part of the impugned award dated 6th June 2011 passed by the learned arbitrator rejecting the claim made by Mr. Suneel Darshan-petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.908 of 2011 however, awarding arbitration costs of Rs.12,00,000/- (Rs. Twelve Lacs only) against Mr. Ajay Singh (Sunny) Deol-the petitioner in Arbitration Petition No.819 of 2011 who was the original respondent. The respondent in the said petition was the original claimant in the arbitral proceedings. Mr. Suneel Darshan is described as the claimant and Mr. Ajay Singh (Sunny) Deol is described as the respondent in this judgment. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding these two petitions are as under :
2. Mr. Ajay Singh (Sunny) Deol-the respondent is an actor by profession. The claimant is a film producer. The dispute arose between the parties relating to production of a film. The said dispute was referred to the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India as the sole arbitrator. On 13th March 2007, the parties arrived at
A.T. Brij Paul Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Madras Vs. Sudarsanam Picture, Madras
Hindustan Steel Ltd. Vs.Messrs Dilip Construction Company
K.P. Poulose Vs. State of Kerala & Anr.
Javer Chand and Ors. Vs. Pukhraj Surana
Hemendra Rasiklal Ghia Vs. Subodh Mody
Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Bombay Vs.Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
M.N.Gangappa v Atmakur Nagabhushanam Setty & Co. - (1973) 3 SCC 406
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.