SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 952

A.S.CHANDURKAR
Piraji Narayanrao Mathankar – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Upasrao Pote – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:V.N. Chitnavis, Advocate.

Judgment

1. Rule. Heard finally.

2. Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order dated 19.12.2013 passed by the Appellate Court allowing the Misc. Civil Appeal filed by the present respondents and setting aside the order passed by the trial court dismissing Regular Civil Suit No.279/2007 under the provisions of Order 9 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the Code).

3. The relevant facts are that one Kasabai Pote, the predecessor of the present respondents had filed Regular Civil Suit No.851/1998 for partition of agricultural land bearing survey nos.56 and 57. It was the case of the said Kasabai that the land in question belonged to her father and that same was ancestral property. After the death of her father, the predecessor of the present petitioner her brother was looking after the said property. Hence, suit for partition and separate possession came to be filed. Her brother – Narayan was arrayed as defendant. On 30.07.2002 Regular Civil Suit No.851/1998 came to be dismissed for want of prosecution. Thereafter, no steps were taken to restore the suit.

4. After the death of Kasabai her legal heirs who are the respondents herein filed Regular Civil Suit No.279/2














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top