R.G.KETKAR
Magnum Developers – Appellant
Versus
Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Y. H. Muchhala, learned senior counsel for the applicants and Mr. Sagheer A. Khan, learned counsel for respondent no.1 at length. Mr. Muchhala orally applies for leave to delete respondent no.2, Maharashtra State Board of Wakfs on the ground that no relief is claimed against it in the present application and is a formal party. On the motion made by Mr. Muchhala, leave to delete respondent no.2 is granted. Amendment shall be carried out forthwith.
2. Rule. Mr. Khan waives service for respondent no.1. At the request and by consent of the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and Application is taken up for final hearing.
3. By this Application under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act, 1995, original defendants no. 1 to 7 have challenged the Judgment and order dated 29.6.2015 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Maharashtra State Waqf Tribunal, Aurangabad, (for short, 'Tribunal'), below Exhibits 19 and 30 in waqf Suit No.144 of 2014. By that order, the Tribunal partly allowed Application-Exhibit-19 filed by respondent no.1 for grant of adinterim injunction und
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd Vs Cherian Varkey Construction Co. (P) Ltd
Abdulla Shahul Hameed v. State of Kerala 2012 (3) KLT 324
Artemiou v. Procopiou 1966 1 QB 878
Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. v. Popular Trading Company, Ujjain
Jamma Masjid, (SIC) v. Kodimaniaudra Deviah and Ors.
Krishna Chandra Vs Panchu Ghosh
M.P. Wakf Board Vs. Subhan Shah
Shanti Kumar Panda Vs. Shakuntala Devi
Shiv Shakti Co-op. Housing Society Vs. Swaraj Developers
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.