A.S.OKA, V.L.ACHLIYA
Pimpri Chinchwad new Town Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
A.S. Oka, J.
FACTUAL MATRIX
Writ Petition No.9525 of 2004
In Writ Petition No.9525 of 2004, the challenge is to the order dated 21st September 2004 passed by the Second Respondent who was the then Hon'ble Minister of State of the Revenue Department of the State Government. The subject matter of the said Writ Petition is the land bearing Survey No.17/6, 25 and 31 (Part) at Village Rahatani, Taluka Haveli, District Pune (for short “the said land”). By the impugned order passed in exercise of the powers under Sub-Section (1) of Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “the Land Acquisition Act”), the Second Respondent directed release of the said land from the acquisition. The acquisition was for the benefit of the Petitioner.
2. The Petitioner is a New Town Development Authority constituted under Sub-Section (2) of Section 113 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short “the MRTP Act”).
3. In the year 1962, the State Government decided to develop an industrial area in the limits of the erstwhile Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Council. For that purpose, large agricultural lands were acquired. After development of the industrial area, it was decided
Amarnath Ashram Trust Society v. Governor of U.P.
Raipur Development Authority v. Chokhamal Contractors [(1989)2 SCC 721]
Reliance Industries Ltd. Designated Authority, (2006) 10 SCC 368
Mutha Associates v. State of Maharashtra
Amarnath Ashram Trust Society v. Governor of U.P. [(1998) 1 SCC 591]
Special Land Acquisition Officer v. Godrej & Boyce [(1988) 1 SCC 50
State Govt. Houseless Harijan Employees Assn. v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.