SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 353

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, K.R.SHRIRAM, B.P.COLABAWALLA
Anil (Vidyarthi) Chanderlal Ailani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra Represented by the Principal Secretary, Government of Maharashtra, Ministry of Urban Development – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. J. M. Puranik for the Petitioner in WP/11278/2012.
Mr. S. M. Gorwadkar – Senior Advocate with Ms. Neeta Karnik, Mr. Sujay Gangal, Mr. Gurudas Gorwadkar, Mr. Mankiral Singh and Mr. Kuldip T. Pawar for the Petitioner in WP/1016/2013.
Mr. A. B. Vagyani – Government Pleader with Mr. Vishal B. Thadani – AGP and Ms. Tintina Hazarika for Respondent No. 1 in both the Petitions.
Mr. Vijay Patil for Respondent No. 2 in WP/11278/2012.
Mr. Jaiwant S. Chandnani for Respondent No. 4 in WP/11278/2012.
Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni – Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. N. R. Bubna with Mr. Shardul Singh for Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 in WP/11278/2012.
Mr. N. R. Bubna with Ms. Pooja Singh Malik for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in WP/1016/2013.
Ms. Shriya Jadhav i/b. Mr. Sachindra B. Shetye for Respondent No. 4 in WP/1016/2013.
Mr. Amol P. Mhatre for Respondent Nos. 13 to 16 in WP/1016/2013.

JUDGMENT :

S. C. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. This Full Bench has been constituted to answer the following question:

“Whether a remedy of election dispute under Section 16 of the said Act or Section 21 of the said Act of 1965 is available to a voter who is entitled to vote in General Ward Elections for challenging the election/nomination of a nominated Councillor?”

2. Some facts necessary for the purpose of a decision on the question and the backdrop of the reference be noted now.

3. The Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 11278 of 2012 had been an elected Councillor of the Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation and completed his tenure of five years from 2007 to 2012. He claims that he is eligible as well as qualified for being nominated as a Councillor, in terms of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Qualifications and Appointment of Nominated Councillors) Rules, 2012. Apart from impleading the State of Maharashtra, the Corporation, Mayor/Presiding Officer, the Petitioner therein has impleaded Respondent Nos. 4 to 8, who were nominated as Councillors of that Corporation by the State, in terms o








































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top