1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. I have heard the learned advocates for the respective sides at length. Since this matter is being disposed of and this order is being passed by consent, I am not required to deal with their entire submissions.

3. The petitioner has preferred Complaint (ULP) No.79/2010 before the Labour Court for challenging his termination dated 13/12/2010 w.e.f. 15/12/2010 by way of punishment after conducting a domestic enquiry into the charges levelled upon him vide charge sheet dated 12/07/2010. By the PartI judgment of the Labour Court dated 10/10/2014, the enquiry is vitiated on account of violation of the principles of natural justice and the findings of the Enquiry Officer have been declared as perverse.

4. The respondent/Management preferred Revision (ULP) No.9/2015 before the Industrial Court, which has been allowed by judgment dated 17/12/2015 and the Part I judgment of the Labour Court stood set aside as the Industrial Court concluded that the enquiry is fair and proper and the findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.

5. It needs mention that the respondent/Management, to my surpri