S.S.SHINDE, K.K.SONAWANE
Alka Udhav Khaire – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
K.K. SONAWANE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of counsel appearing for both sides.
2. This application is preferred by the applicants invoking remedy under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. read with Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and thereby prayed to quash and set aside the impugned FIR bearing Crime No. 199 of 2016 registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 468, 471, 477 r/w. 34 of IPC at police station, Partur, Dist. Jalna. The impugned FIR came to be registered pursuant to the directions of the learned Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C. issued in a private criminal complaint filed under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. by the respondent No.2 Dr. Ramprasad Mohanlal Porwal.
3. It has been alleged that the applicants being employee of the Municipal Council, Partur have indulgence in the offence of forgery for the mischief of cheating and misappropriation of public funds and thereby committed the Criminal Breach of Trust etc. According to respondent No.2/complainant, in the year 2013-14, there were two vehicles of the Municipal Council, Purtur for public utility services. The applicant No.2 Shri Manohar Tunganwar, Sani
Anil Kumar and others Vs. M.K. Aiyappa and another reported in (2013)10 SCC 705
Bhagwan Prasad Srivastava Vs. N.P. Mishra
Parkash Singh Badal Vs. State of Punjab
Panchabhai Popatbhai Butani vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Vs. Bhushan Chander and others
Rajib Ranjan and others Vs. R. Vijay Kumar reported in (2015)1 SCC 513
Shambhunath vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.