IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.S. SHINDE, A.M. DHAVALE, JJ.
The Addl. Sessions Judge, Hingoli – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwat S/o Parbati Kshirsagar – Respondent
CONFIRMATION CASE NO.1 OF 2017, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 180 OF 2017
Decided on : 11-01-2018
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Sections 3 and 4 – Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 366 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 r/w Sec. 34 – Offence of Murder - Kidnapping - Committing gang rape - Aggrieved accused have filed appeal against their convictions and sentences - Along with the two accused their parents and brother of accused no.1, total five in number were also prosecuted but they were acquitted - Unfortunate victim Siddhi was aged four years and three months- She was daughter of P-W-1 residing at Warangal District Accused no-1 and accused no-2 Rahul are neighbours of P-W-1 their houses are situated in front of house of P-W-1 - On at about noon returned from her play school- She took her lunch and she was playing with her sister aged two years in front of her house - Her fathers step mother P-W-6 was sitting in front of her house - At about accused no-1 and accused no-2 appellants came there and offered to provide chocolates to Siddhi- Siddhi being unaware about evil intention of accused nos-1 and 2 she followed them calling them - Held there was a rape and murder by gagging mouth- Though it was held as a murder it was held that it may not be intentional and therefore death sentence was reduced to imprisonment for life- facts in present case are similar- Though accused can be held guilty u/s 302 on account of doing an act imminently dangerous it is not clear whether they intended to cause death of Siddhi or not- offence of murder in this case is not diabolical though rape & sodomy are brutal- Extreme young age is recognized as mitigating circumstance - Hence Court hold that this is not rarest of rare case - However considering gravity and seriousness of offences Court feel it necessary to hold that imprisonment for life should not be less than years without remission - Criminal Application disposed of
A.M. DHAVALE, J.
1. In Special (POCSO) Case No. 3 of 2016, accused nos. 1 & 2 were convicted for kidnapping a girl, aged four years for the purpose of subjecting her to illicit intercourse, for committing gang rape and for committing unnatural intercourse and thereafter committing her murder by gagging her mouth by stuffing raw cotton and for causing disappearance of evidence all acts committed in furtherance of common intention of them and sentenced them to various terms as follows.
| OFFENCE | SENTENCE | ||
|
| Substantive | Fine | In default |
| 363, 34 IPC | 7 years | Rs. 500/- | R I. 3 months |
| 366, 34 IPC | 10 years | Rs. 500/ | R.I. 3 months |
| 376(2)(I) r/w 34 IPC. | RI for life
| Rs. 1000/ | R. I. 6 months
|
| 377, 34 IPC | R.I. for life | Rs. 1000/ | R.I. 6 months |
| 302, 34 IPC | Sentenced to death |
|
|
| 201/34 IPC | 7 years | Rs. 500/ | R.I. 6 months |
2. They are sentenced to capital punishment for committing murder punishable under Section 302 r/w Sec. 34 of Indian Penal Code. Hence, the ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Hingoli has made reference under Section 366 Cr.P.C. for confirmation of sentence. Whereas the aggrieved accused have filed appeal against their convictions and sentences. Along with the two accused, their parents and brother of accused no.1, total five in number were also prosecuted, but they were acquitted. Accused nos.1 and 2 were also prosecuted for offences under Sections 3 and 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (hereinafter referred to as 'POCSO Act' for brevity) in the alternative to the charge u/s 376 (2)(f), (i) and 377 of IPC. The judgment is delivered by Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli (Shri. M. P. Divate) on 7.4.2017.
3. The facts relevant for deciding these proceedings may be stated as follows:
The unfortunate victim Siddhi was aged four years and three months. She was daughter of P.W.1 Sambhaji, residing at Waranga (Masai), Taluka Kalamnuri, District Hingoli. Accused no.1 Bhagwat Kshirsagar and accused no.2 Rahul Kshirsagar are neighbours of P.W.1 Sambhaji and their houses are situated in front of house of P.W.1 Sambhaji. On 7.1.2016, at about 12.00 noon, Siddhi returned from her play school. She took her lunch and she was playing with her sister Riddhi aged two years in front of her house. Her father's step mother P.W.6 Gayabai was sitting in front of her house. At about 12.30 to 1.00 p.m., accused no.1 Bhagwat and accused no.2 Rahul (appellants) came there and offered to provide chocolates to Siddhi. Siddhi being unaware about evil intention of accused nos.1 and 2, she followed them calling them as 'bhaiyabhaiya'. They took her along with them to a shop of PW8 Shaikh Bismillah. Thereafter, she did not return. P.W.6 Gayabai started searching for Siddhi. At 3.30 p.m., one Masarao made a phone call and informed to PW1 Sambhaji who was out station for work that Siddhi was missing. PW1 Sambhaji returned home at 4:30 p.m. PW6 Gayabai told him that sometime after 12.00 noon, both the accused had taken away Siddhi towards a shop for providing chocolates and since then she was missing. Then, P.W.1 Sambhaji and his relatives and villagers searched for Siddhi and as she was not found, Sambhaji reached Kalamnuri Police Station at 6.30 p.m. and reported about missing of Siddhi. The police did not record the report but came along with P.W.1 Sambhaji to the village and took both the accused to the Police Station. Then Police Inspector with other staff came to the village for taking search. They inspected one house at 9.45 p.m., which is claimed to be of accused no.3 Parbati (father of accused no.1 Bhagwat). They found Siddhi in dead condition kept in one white bag of fertilizer with gagging of her mouth by stuffing of raw cotton in her mouth. There were blood stains on her clothes and there were injuries on her vagina and anus sh
Anjan Kumar Sarma Vs State of Assam AIR 2017 SC 2617
Abdul Razzaq v State of U.P. AIR 2015 SC 1770
Ashwinikumar Vs. State of M.P. AIR 2013 SC 553
Bantu Singh v State of M.P. AIR 2002 SC 70
Bantu Versus State of Uttar Pradesh (2008) 11 SCC 113
Bodh Raj v. State of J. and K. (2002 (8) SCC 45
C. Muniappan and others vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Devender Pal Singh v Delhi [2002 (5)SCC 234 ]
D.K. Basu v. State of W.B. (2002) 1 SCC 351
Dhananjoy Chatterjee v State of W.B. (1994) 2 SCC 220
Hanumant v State of M.P. AIR 1952 SC 343
Harpal Singh v State of Himachal Pradesh AIR 1981 SC 361
Hari Ram v State of Rajasthan (2009)13 SCC 211
Jashuba Bharatsinh Gohil v. State of Gujarat (1994 (4) SCC 353)
Krishan Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana
Laxman Naik v State of Orissa (1994) 3 SCC 381
Machhi Singh V State of Punjab (1983) 3 SCC 470
M. Prabhulal v. The Assistant Director DRI (2003) 8 SCC 449.
Mukesh Vs State (NCT of Delhi) (Nirbhaya’s Case) 2017(6) SCC 1
Machhi Singh V State of Punjab (1983) 3 SCC 470.
Pradeep N Madgaonkar vs. State of Maharashtra (1995) 4 SCC 255.
Pannalal Damodar v. State of Maharashtra (1979) 4 SCC 526.
Padala Veera Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1990 SC 79
Rameshbhai Mohanbhai Koli v. State of Maharashtra (2011) 11 SCC 111.
Rajendra Wasnik v State of Maharashtra (2012) 4 SCC 37.
Ravindra Shantram Sawan v. State of Maharashtra (2002) 5 SCC 604.
Ram Reddy v State of A.P. [2006 (10) SCC 172]
Sujit Biswas Vs. State of Assam AIR 2013 SC 3817
Sahadevan vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2012 SC 2435
State of Karnataka v. M.V. Mahesh [(2003) 3 SCC 353]
Sharad Sarda v State of Maharashtra AIR 1984 SC 1622
Shyamal Ghosh v State of West Bengal (2012) 7 SCC 646
Shankarlal Vs. State of Maharashtra AIR 1981 SC 765.
Shivaji Alhat v State of Maharashtra (2008) 15 SCC 269.
State of U.P. v Satish (2005) 3 SCC 114.
Smt. Bharad relied on Kanhaiya Lal v State of Rajasthan 2014(4) SCC 715
Shivaji Alhat v State of Maharashtra (2008) 15 SCC 269
Surja Ram v. State of Rajasthan [(1996) 6 SCC 271]
State of U.P. v Deoman Upadhyaya AIR 1960 SC 1125
State of Maharashtra Versus Nisar Ramzan Sayyed (2017) 5 SCC 673
Vashram Narshibhai Rajpara V State of Gujarat (2002) 9 SCC 168
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.