B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM
Yakub Abdul Razak Memon – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through CBI , Bombay – Respondent
Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) refers to the punishment for criminal conspiracy. The legal document extensively discusses this provision in the context of the 1993 Bombay serial bomb blasts case, where a common charge of conspiracy under Section 120B IPC was framed against all co-accused, read with Section 3(3) of TADA and other offences.
Judgment :-
P. Sathasivam, J.
1) This appeal and the connected matters have been directed against the final orders and judgments of conviction and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No. 1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence and by the CBI for confirmation of the death sentence and against the acquittal of some of the accused persons. 2) Brief facts:
The case of the prosecution is as follows:
(a) Babri Masjid at Ayodhya was demolished on 06.12.1992. After its demolition, violence broke out throughout the country. In order to take revenge of the said demolition, Tiger Memon (AA) and Dawood Ibrahim, a resident of Dubai, formulated a conspiracy to commit a terrorist act in the city of Bombay. In pursuance of the said object, Dawood Ibrahim agreed to send arms and ammunitions from abroad. Tiger Memon, in association with his men, particularly, the accused persons, received those arms and ammunitions through sea-coasts of Bomba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.