G.S.KULKARNI
Vishal Nitinkumar Kondhia – Appellant
Versus
Jahnvi Vishal Kondhia – Respondent
1. Rule on both these petitions returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties and at their request the petitions are taken up for final hearing.
2. The petitions arise between the same parties arising from the same proceedings before the family court at Mumbai, as also the issues are quite interconnected. The petitions were accordingly heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. Both the petitions are filed by the petitioner-husband and the common respondent is the wife.
3. The issue which arises for consideration in the first petition is as to whether the petitioner-husband in defending matrimonial proceedings instituted by the respondent-wife before the family court at Mumbai, can be permitted to raise a defense by amending written statement, on the basis of a divorce decree obtained by him from the Dubai Court and whether the Family Court was justified in rejecting such amendment to the written statement. In the second petition the issue which falls for consideration is whether it was permissible for the petitioner to withdraw his consent to seek divorce by mutual consent as contained in a written pursis filed before the Family Court. The petition
Ajendraprasadji N.Pandey & Anr. Vs. Swami Keshavprakashdasji N. and Ors.
Bharti Bhausaheb Aher Vs. Bhausaheb Kautik Aher
Haridas Das Vs. Usha Rani Bank (Smt) and Ors.
Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs. Deepa Bhatnagar
J. Samuel & Ors. Vs. Gattu Mahesh & Ors.
Pandurang Dhondi Chougule V. Maruti Hari Jadhav
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.