S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, M.S.KARNIK
Suhas Digambar Herlekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
M.S. KARNIK, J.
1. Heard
2. Rule. The respondents waive service. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.
3. By this Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek quashment of the order dated 22/06/2018 denying them pension and further declaration that the petitioner-employees of Ayurvedic, Unani and homeopathic aided educational institutions opting for voluntary retirement/resignation, after completing qualifying service period, are entitled to pension and gratuity benefits.
The brief facts of the case are as under :
4. The petitioners are appointed on various dates with the respondent Nos. 4 to 7-Colleges. The details of their appointment and length of services are mentioned in the chart which is at page 6 of the Petition Memo. All the petitioners have admittedly completed more than 20 years of service. It is the petitioner’s case that they voluntarily retired from service of their respective Colleges by giving letters in the form of resignation. According to the petitioners, they have opted for voluntary retirement from service. Their letters are to be read as for voluntary retirement, though it is in the form of re
Asger Ibrahim Amin Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Ghanshyam Dass Relhan Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
M.R. Prabhakar and ors.Vs. Canara Bank and ors.
Reserve Bank of India Vs. Cecil Dennis Solomon.
Shashikala Devi Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.
Sheelkumar Jain Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd and ors.
UCO Bank and ors. Vs. Sanwar Mal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.