SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 253

S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, A.M.BADAR, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Electricity Ombudsman, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.A. Kumbhakoni, Adv., Rahul Sinha, Adv., S.B. Lolge, Adv., Dsk Legal, Adv., Abhay Nevagi, Adv., Sandesh Shukla, Adv., Amit Singh, Adv., Santosh Sawant, Adv., Abhay Nevagi & Associates, Adv., R.S. Apte, Adv., Padmanabh D. Pise, Adv., Rahul Narichania, Adv., Nidhish Mehrotra, Adv., Darshan Furia, Adv., Zoya Syed, Adv., Ashish Mehta, Adv., Neeta Masurkar, Adv., S.G. Thakur, Adv., Nieyaati Masurkar, Adv., Gautam Ankhad, Adv., Ankur Shah, Adv., Hemant Sethi, Adv., Shruti D. Vyas, Adv., Kavita Anchan, Adv., Arsh Mishra, Adv., M.V. Kini & Co, Adv., Abhishek Khare, Adv., P. Kedia, Adv., Bindu Bhatia, Adv., Khare Legal Chambers, Adv., Shyam Mehta, Adv., Arijit Maitra, Adv., Madhusudan G. Gawde, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

Civil Writ Petition No.10764 of 2011 was placed before a Learned Single Judge of this Court on 24-1-2012. He made the following order:-

"1 Heard Ms. Raksha Gala, for the Petitioner.

2 On 17th January,2012, following order was passed:-

"1 Heard Ms. Gala, Advocate for Petitioner.

2 The impugned bill seeking difference of electricity charges levied on the basis of multiplying factor one instead of multiplying factor of 2 was issued in the month of December 2010 for the period of September, 2003 to December, 2010. Prima facie Sub-Section 2 of Section 56 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 will not empower the Petitioner to recover any amount for period of 2 years prior to the date of demand namely prior to December, 2008. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has relied upon the Judgment of Division Bench (Ranjana Desai and A.A. Sayed, JJ) in the case of Rototex Polyester & anr. v/s. Administrator, Administration of Dadra and Nagar Havli (U.T.) Electricity Department, Silvassa & Ors., (2010) 4 BCR 456.

The Electricity Ombudsman relied upon the following Judgments of the High Court.

(a) Judgment of the Division Bench in W.P. (L) No.221 of 2006 Mr. Awadesh S.








































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top