IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, N.M. JAMDAR, JJ.
Worli Koliwada Nakhwa Matsya Vyavasay Sahkari Society Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai - Respondent
Writ Petition (L) No. 560 of 2019, Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 39 of 2019, 44 of 2019, 40 of 2019, 36 of 2019, Public Interest Litigation No. 25 of 2019
Decided On : 16-07-2019
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 14 - Environment Protection Act - Sections 3(1) and 3(2)(v) - Metropolitan City of Mumbai lies on Western Coast of India by bank of Arabian Sea - Mumbai is made from the group of seven islands and is thus referred to as the Island city - These islands are Isle of Bombay, Mazgaon, Colaba, Old Womans Island, Parel, Worli, and Salsette Island - Eastern Coast of Salsette Island has rows of mangroves, whereas Western Coast happens to be sandy and stony - Due to proximity to the sea, soil cover of this region is sandy to a large extent - Underlying rocks of this area are made up of Black Deccan Basalt pours - Island city of Mumbai is divided into two distinct regions; city and the suburbs - Suburbs have alluvial soil type - Major creeks found in Mumbai coast are Manori, Malad and Mahim which protrudes in mainland and give rise to mudflats and swamps - Area is drained by Mahim, Mithi, Dahisar and Polsar rivers - These small rivers near coast, form small rivulets which intermingle with each other resulting in swamps and mudflats in low lying areas - It took over 150 years to join original seven islands of Mumbai - JTC submitted its report - Divided into seven chapters, JTC set out background to consider need for a ring road/coastal freeway for Mumbai - Background captured by JTC highlights that current population of the city was 12.4 million - That historically, characteristic of traffic patterns was Southbound flow in the morning and Northbound flow in the evening - Background captures traffic-related solution issues - With reference to aforenoted factual data background note highlights that a coastal freeway would not only facilitate high travel speeds on the road but also take away traffic from internal roads thereby enhancing vehicular movement at high speed which in turn would reduce pollution - Background note thereafter proceeds to highlight whether a coastal road could be constructed within existing framework of laws – Held, Thus, notwithstanding argument of learned Senior Counsel for MCGM that projects or activities listed under categories in the Schedule to the Notification are independent and exhaustive and as a result thereof Entries at Serial No. 8 cannot be read as residual entries, and as regards Entry 7(f), it is exhaustive, and merely because a road does not fall therein same cannot be read as falling under Entry 8(b) is also correct, but in instant case land reclaimed is 90 hectare and only 20 hectare thereof is actually being utilized for purpose of constructing the coastal road - Court have already held herein above that clearance under CRZ-2011 is liable to be struck down and thus, court answer the theoretical question posed by learned Counsel for the respondents - Court are dealing an environmental issue and precautionary principle guides that all precautions envisaged by Regulations to appraise proposals for projects or activities likely to impact environment have to be strictly followed - On the issue of public consultation, suffice it to state that public consultation was at the stage when CRZ-2011 was proposed to be amended and not at the stage of appraisal of material from the point of view of public participation - Thus, court hold that there is lack of substantial compliance with EIA Notification - Public Interest Litigations and the Writ Petition are accordingly disposed of restraining MCGM from executing the works required to lay down the coastal road - Court quash approval granted and the final approval also - Court further declare that MCGM cannot proceed with the works without obtaining an environmental clearance under EIA Notification - Further, permission under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 would also be obtained by MCZMA - Petitions are allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.
1. The Metropolitan City of Mumbai lies on the Western Coast of India by the bank of the Arabian Sea. Mumbai is made from the group of seven islands and is thus referred to as the Island city. These islands are Isle of Bombay, Mazgaon, Colaba, Old Woman's Island, Parel, Worli, and Salsette Island. The Eastern Coast of Salsette Island has rows of mangroves, whereas the Western Coast happens to be sandy and stony. Due to proximity to the sea, the soil cover of this region is sandy to a large extent. The underlying rocks of this area are made up of Black Deccan Basalt pours. The island city of Mumbai is divided into two distinct regions; the city and the suburbs. The suburbs have alluvial soil type. The major creeks found in Mumbai coast are Manori, Malad and Mahim which protrudes in the mainland and give rise to mudflats and swamps. The area is drained by Mahim, Mithi, Dahisar and Polsar rivers. These small rivers near the coast, form small rivulets which intermingle with each other resulting in swamps and mudflats in the low lying areas. It took over 150 years to join the original seven islands of Mumbai. These seven islands were lush green thickly wooded, and dotted with 22 hills, with the Arabian Sea washing through them at high tide. The first island of Mumbai was only 24 km long and 4 km wide from Dongri to Malabar Hill (at its broadest point), and the other six were Colaba, Old Woman's Island, Mahim, Parel, Worli, Mazgaon. After the British arrived, the demand for land steadily increased, and by 1730; it was becoming impossible to accommodate the entire population of Mumbai inside the Fort. The sea was making inroads at Worli, Mahim and Mahalaxmi, which turned the ground between the islands into a swamp, making travel between Mumbai islands hazardous. The first major reclamation took place in 1708, to construct the causeway between Mahim and Sion. The second major reclamation took place in 1772, to stop the ingress of water and the consequent flooding of central Mumbai, and to connect Mahalaxmi and Worli. This causeway was named Hornby Vellard, sealing the Great Breach (Breach Candy) between Dongri, Malabar hill and Worli. At the fortified Dongri hill, an esplanade and parade ground was cleared, from the walls of the Fort to the present-day Crawford market. The flatlands from Mahalaxmi to Kamathipura were reclaimed only after the completion of construction of Breach Candy by Hornby in 1784. In 1803, Mumbai was connected to Salsette by a causeway from Sion. The Thane and Colaba causeway was built during the tenure of Sir Robert Grant, the Governor of Mumbai. He was also responsible for the construction of several roads between Mumbai and the hinterland. The Colaba Causeway was completed in 1838 joining Colaba, Old Woman's island and the H-shaped island of Mumbai together. Land prices shot up, and Colaba became the centre of commerce. The Causeway was widened and strengthened from 1861 to 1863 (Cusrow Baug is built on the causeway). The horse-drawn tramcars revolutionised transport in Colaba. The Prongs Lighthouse was constructed off the island in 1875, and in the same year, the Sassoon Docks were built by David Sassoon on reclaimed land. The BB & CI (Bombay and Central India) Railways established a terminus at Colaba. Around 90,000 sq. yard of land was reclaimed on the Western shore of Colaba by the City Improvement Trust; the work was completed in 1905. A seaside promenade (Cuffe Parade) was completed the next year. The next reclamation took place in the year 1836 when the development of the Mumbai port had already begun. Major quarrying had already begun in 1870. The hills of Chinchpokli and Byculla were quarried and dumped into the sea, to fill the land near the railway line, the swamps and also the port to prevent the accumulation of stagnant water. The first railway line was laid in 1
Assam Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Assam
Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Environmental Action Group & Ors.
Bombay Environmental Act Group & Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Consumer Action Group Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
D. B. Realty Limited v. the State of Maharashtra
DLF Universal Ltd. Vs. Anthony A.V. & Ors.
Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action Vs. U.O.I.
Kishan Prakash Sharma & Ors. Vs. U.O.I. & Ors.
Lafarge Umaim Mining Pvt. Ltd. V/s. Union of India & Ors.
M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. U.P. Financial Corporation & Ors
Macquarie Bank Ltd. Vs. Shilp Cable Technologies Ltd.
Narmada Bachao Andolon Vs. U.O.I.
Omkumar & Ors. Vs. Union of India
Puthumma & Ors. Vs. State of Kerala & Ors.
Shivshankar Sugar Ltd. Vs. Shree Renuka Sugar Ltd.
State of Bombay v. F. N. Balsara
State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat
State of Punjab and Ors. Vs. Khanchand & Ors
Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.