JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of parties heard finally.

2. Brief facts leading for filing the Writ Petition, disclosed in the memo of the petition are as under:

It is the case of the Petitioner that, the Petitioner got married with one Santosh Arvind Kadam i.e., Respondent No.2 herein, on 24.07.1998. Prior to the marriage, Petitioner started working after completing two years architectural draftsman course recognized by the Government (I.T.I.). The Petitioner was working with an Architect Ravi Gone, Vashi. Petitioner was working there since the year 1992, and in the year 1993 she had opened her bank account with Abhyudaya Cooperative Bank Ltd. Thereafter, from August 1994 to August 1995, the Petitioner did her apprenticeship from Mumbai Municipal Corporation and completed three years diploma course. On or about 14th May 1995, the Petitioner along with others started a company under the name and style of “Designer's Home”. The Petitioner was doing work with 36 societies work with CIDCO, and out of her earnings and savings the Petitioner then purchased different land properties.

3. It is the case of the Petitioner that, on or about 15th November 1996, th