SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, G.S. PATEL, JJ.
Shri Ramnarayan Nathuprasad Pande & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (L) No. 2217 of 2017 with Chamber Summons (ST) No. 120 of 2019 and Notice of Motion No. 282 of 2018 and Chamber Order (L) No. 596 of 2019
Decided On : 13-08-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Karan Bhosale,with Rohit Jadhav.
For the Respondent: Ms. Rupali Adhate, Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP., Mr KG Linje, Sub-Engineer (B & F), P/South Ward.

The duty of the Municipal Corporation to ensure safety and the limitations of the court's jurisdiction in deciding technical matters.

Headnote:

Section 354 - Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888 - [Section 354] - The judgment discusses the challenge to a notice issued under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888. The notice pertains to a building declared dilapidated and dangerous, requiring evacuation and demolition. The court considered conflicting expert reports, the duty of the Municipal Corporation, and the rights and obligations of occupants and owners. The court upheld the notice, emphasizing the safety of occupants and the public.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged a notice issued under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888, pertaining to a building declared dilapidated and dangerous. The petitioners claimed the building was not in a dilapidated condition and sought an ad-interim order to prevent enforcement of the notice.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the building was in a highly dilapidated condition and upheld the notice. It rejected the petitioners' arguments regarding incomplete job by the Technical Advisory Committee and conflicting expert reports. The court emphasized the duty of the Municipal Corporation to ensure safety and upheld the notice in the interest of public safety.

Issues: The issues involved the challenge to a notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888, conflicting expert reports, and the duty of the Municipal Corporation to ensure safety.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty of the Municipal Corporation to ensure safety and upheld the notice in the interest of public safety. It also highlighted the rights and obligations of occupants and owners, and the limitations of the court's jurisdiction in deciding technical matters.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the ad-interim order was vacated. The court upheld the notice issued under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888, emphasizing the safety of occupants and the public.

JUDGMENT :

1. The Petitioners are challenging the notices issued under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888 (“MMC Act”).

2. Since a number of Petitions were pending in this Court involving similar challenge but finding that pendency of these Petitions and the interim orders passed therein would not be conducive to the protection/safety of the inhabitants, as also the larger public interest being seriously affected by the pendency of these petitions, the Municipal Advocates were called upon to furnish list of all pending matters including interim orders therein.

3. The present petition is one such petition.

4. The challenge is to the 354 notice but we must reproduce the copy of the notice annexed as Exhibit “A” to the Petition. That reads as under:

“BRIHANMUMBAI MAHANAGARPALIKA ACP/S/B-46/SR-335/A.E.(B&F) – I, Dtd.: 08/08/2017

To,

The Owner/Landlord,

(1) Shri. Ramnarayan Nathuprasad Pande,

(2) Shri. Umashankar Nathuprasad Pande,

(3) Shri shivprakash Nathuprasad Pande,

(4) Shri. Keshav Durgaprasad Pande,

(5) Smt. Kusumlata Suryakant Pande, Sukh Sadan Building, Gogatewadi, Opp. Sanmitra Mandal Vidya Mandir School, Of. Aarey Road, Goregaon (E), Mumbai – 400 063.

Sub.:Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Meeting was held in the chamber of Directo (E.S. & P.) on 13/07/2017 @ 5:15 p.m. regarding dangerous and dilapidated condition of the building known as ‘Sukh Sadan Building’, Gogatewadi, Opp. Sanmitra Mandal Vidya Mandir School, Of. Aarey Road, Goregaon (E), Mumbai – 400 063.

Ref.:(1) Notice under section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 under No. ACPS/BF-46/354/453/AE (B&F) of 2014-15, dtd. 13/05/2014.

(2) W.P. No. 1375 of 2015 order dated 30/06/2016.

(3) No. DIR/ES&P/153/Conf. dt.29/07/2017.

Gentleman/Madam,

You are aware that your building “Sukh Sadan Building”, Gogatewadi, Opp. Sanmitra Mandal Vidya Mandir School, Of. Aarey Road, Goregaon (E), Mumbai – 400 063 is declared dilapidated and dangerous (C-1 Category) by M.C.G.M. Notice under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 under No. ACPS/BF-46/354/453/AE(B&F) of 2014-15, dtd. 13/05/2014 is already issued and yhou were directed to evacuate the building immediately. As per Hon’ble Court order dated 30/06/2016, the said matter was referred to T.A.C. As per T.A.C. opinion the said building known as ‘Sukh Sadan’ is in severely dilapidated condition may collapse without giving any warning, thereby endangering the life and property of the residents and the people residing in the adjoining property and passerby. Hence, the structure under reference is not habitable and need to be vacated and demolished immediately under the supervision of Structural Consultant.

You are therefore directed to vacate and pull down the above mentioned building within 48 Hours from receipt of this letter, failing which this office will demolished the said building on 11/08/2017 or thereafter at your risk and cost and evacuating tenants/occupants/owners forcefully with help of Police force, which may please be noted.

Sd/- 8/8/17

Assttt. Commissioner, P/South”

5. The subject of the notice is that the Technical Advisory Committee (“TAC”) met and discussed the issue of the dangerous and dilapidated condition of the building known as ‘Sukh Sadan’, Gogatewadi, Opposite Sanmitra Mandal Vidya Mandir School, Of Aarey Road, Goregaon (East), Mumbai 400 063. It is common ground that the occupants of this building were in receipt of a prior notice under identical provision and that is dated 13th May 2014. Thereafter, there is an order of this Court of 30th June 2016 in Writ Petition No. 1375 of 2015. Pursuant to the same there was a communication dated 29th July 2017.

6. After the above material was considered, the Assistant Commissioner, P/South Ward, who has been delegated the power by the Municipal Commissioner, opined that this building is not capable of being repaired and that, despite this, it continued to be occupied for number of years thereafter. This is a building which is in a highly dilapidated condition. It may collapse without giv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top