Zoru Darayus Bhathena vs Tree Authority, Mumbai MCGM

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1457

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Zoru Darayus Bhathena – Appellant
Versus
Tree Authority, Mumbai MCGM – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Janak Dwarkadas, Adv., Sonal, Adv., Rishika, Adv., Harish, Adv., Pushpa Thapa, Adv., Aspi Chinoy, Adv., Ravi Kadam, Adv., Ashish Kamat, Adv., Aruna Savla, Adv., Vidya Gharpur, Adv., S.M. Modle, Adv., K.H. Mastakar, Adv., Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, Adv., Akshay Shinde, Adv., Geeta Shastri, Adv., Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

The two captioned petitions are being disposed of by a singular order because in both petitions the challenge is to the resolution dated 29th August 2019 passed by the Tree Authority Mumbai. The Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 2410/2019 has prayed as under:-

"(a) that this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and call for the papers and proceedings relating to the Resolution dated 29.08.2019 annexed and marked at Exhibit-A to the petition passed by Respondent No.1 authority and after examining the legality and propriety thereof be pleased to quash the same."

2. The Petitioner in Writ Petition (L) No. 2565/2019 has prayed as under:-

"(a) that this Honourable Court be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and call for the papers and proceedings relating to the Impugned Resolution dated 29.08.2019, as recorded in the Minutes of Meeting annexed and marked at Exhibit-C to the petition, passed by Respon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Bom) 1457

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, BHARATI H.DANGREZoru Darayus Bhathena – AppellantVersusTree Authority, Mumbai MCGM – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Zoru Darayus Bhathena – Appellant
Versus
Tree Authority, Mumbai MCGM – Respondent