SUNIL B.SHUKRE, MADHAV J.JAMDAR
Manali W/o Makrand Kshirsagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Madhav J. Jamdar, J.
1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally forthwith by consent of learned counsel of all the parties.
2. In both the above Criminal Applications, the power of this Court under Section 482 is invoked seeking that First Information Report – Crime No.0251 dated 27.04.2019 registered by the M.I.D.C. Police Station, Nagpur for the offences under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1) (xiv)of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as “said Act of 1989”) be quashed. The said F.I.R. has been registered on the basis of complaint made by the respondent No.2. As the First Information Report sought to be quashed in both the applications is one and the same, both the criminal applications are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.
3. As far as Criminal Application No.477 of 2019 is concerned, the applicant No.1 is the Principal of Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering, Wanadongri, Nagpur (hereinafter referred to as “said college”), the applicant No.2 is the Head of the Mechanical Department of the said college and the applicant No.3 was working as Administrative Officer in the said college from 24.05.20
Anis Ahmed S/o Abdul Majid Ahmed Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Golugiri Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. State of A.P.
Kishan Singh (Dead) Through LRs. Vs. Gurpal Singh and Ors.
Pradnya Pradeep Kenkare and Anr., Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra .Vs. Shashikant Eknath Shinde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.