S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, BHARATI H.DANGRE
Lalit Kumar Modi – Appellant
Versus
Special Director, Directorate Of Enforcement – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. C. Dharmadhikari, J. - Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.
2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner claims the following reliefs:-
"(a) issue a Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ/order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision contained in the letter dated 10th of July 2015 to the extent the Respondent No. 1 has refused the request of the Petitioner to cross examine the witnesses whose statements were recorded under Section 37 of FEMA and whose statements have been relied upon in the complaint;
(b) issue a writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to issue summons to Mr. N. Srinivasan, Mr. Prasanna Kannan, Mr. Sundar Raman, Mr. Chirayu Amin, Mr. Shashank Manohar, Mr. Ratnakar Shetty, Ravi Shankar Shastri, Mr. M. P. Pandove and Mr. Peter Griffith ("the said witnesses") and permit the advocates for the Petitioner to cross examine them;
(c) issue a Writ of Mandamus an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.