A.S.OKA, M.S.SONAK
Vihar Durve – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A.S.Oka, J. - The submissions of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties were heard on the earlier date. The petitioner who is a Chartered Accountant by profession has raised several issues concerning the infrastructure of the judiciary in the State.
2. Before we go to the details, we must refer to the prayers. The first prayer is for seeking a direction to establish additional 867 Courts in the State of Maharashtra. There is a prayer for setting up 20 fast track Courts for exclusively trying the cases of senior citizens, differently abled persons and marginalised sections of the society. In the petition, there are averments regarding necessity of establishing adequate number of Special Courts in the State for exclusively trying the cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Therefore, there is a prayer seeking a direction to establish 48 Special Courts in the State. The petitioner has contended that there is a need to have more family Courts in the State. Therefore, there is a prayer made that there should be additional 17 posts of family Court judges in the city of Mumbai, 5 in Pune and 5 at Nagpur. There is a prayer for establishment of Courts of District
All India Judges Association (3) vs. Union of India
All India Judges Association vs. Union of India
Brij Mohan Lal vs. Union of India
Hussainara Khatoon and others vs. Home Secretary, State of Bihar
Imtiyaz Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Namit Sharma vs. Union of Inda
Partur Bar Association vs. State of Maharashtra
Purshottam s/o Manohar Kamone vs. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.