IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
K.K. Tated, J.
Dynacraft Machine Co. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Vinod Shenoy - Respondent
First Appeal No. 366 of 2017
Decided On : 19-11-2019
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 227 - Mental Health Act, 1987 - Sections 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 65, 69, 76 - Specific Relief Act - Section 31 - Companies Act, 1956 - Section 457 - Neuro-Degeneration - In premises civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause subject to right of Respondent to intervene and appear as a claimant or as a purported constituted attorney of before NCLT in pending company petition without prejudice to his right in present appeal or otherwise generally that is to say in all cases other than pending company petition to claim as a legal guardian civil application is disposed of in above terms - In meantime parties including NCLT to act on authenticated copy of this order - Needless to add that these observations made by court are for purpose of deciding three civil applications and considering admission of first appeal and these observations shall not influence NCLT whilst determining company petition - Held, This itself shows that Respondent on his own obtained certificate from Hospital and placed on record before Trial Court - Trial Court without taking interview relied on said certificate - Even said certificate shows that was brought to hospital - In present proceedings Respondent filed petition - This itself shows that before filing petition Respondent had started process of taking medical certificate from Hospital - Trial Court without calling any witness from Hospital has blatantly accepted same and passed impugned order - Copy of complaint filed by deceased through her Advocate with Senior Inspector of Police Cuff Parade Police Station stating that her son had committed several offences against her and tried to grab her property - Appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT
K.K.Tated, J. - Heard. By consent of both the parties and as per order dated 12.07.2019, the matter is taken on board for final hearing. The Registry has called R & P, which is duly received.
2. By this First Appeal the Appellant is challenging the oral order dated 10.04.2015 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai in Mental Health Petition No.4/2015 (hereinafter referred to as the "said petition") in the matter of appointment of guardian u/s.53 of the Mental Health Act 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) allowing the application filed by the Respondent - original Petitioner and appointed him as a guardian of Ms.Jessica Iqbal Lukmani (Jessica Shenoy) (hereinafter referred to as Ms.Jessica) to take care of her, under the provisions of the said Act.
3. The First Appeal is filed by the Appellant - third party being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 10.04.2015.
4. The Appellant had filed Civil Application No.1042/2017 for leave to appeal against the impugned order which was allowed by this court by order dated 13.04.2017.
5. The Appellant had also filed Civil Application No.1297/2017 for an order of stay to the effect, operation and implementation of the impugned order which was allowed by this court by order dated 13.04.2017 part of which reads thus:
"6. In the premises, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (c), subject to the right of the Respondent to intervene and appear as a claimant or as a purported constituted attorney of Jessica Lukmani before the NCLT in the pending company petition, without prejudice to his right in the present appeal, or otherwise generally, that is to say, in all cases other than the pending company petition, to claim as a legal guardian of Jessica Lukmani. The civil application is disposed of in the above terms.
7 In the meantime, the parties, including NCLT, to act on the authenticated copy of this order. Needless to add that these observations made by the court are for the purpose of deciding the three civil applications and considering the admission of the first appeal and these observations shall not influence the NCLT whilst determining the company petition.
8 First Appeal (Stamp) No.9457/2017 shall be tagged along with First Appeal No.243/2017. The Appellant to remove all office objections and get the first appeal numbered within two weeks from today.
9 Certified copy expedited."
Few facts of the matter are, as under:
6. The Respondent - son of Jessica Iqbal Lukmani, filed the petition for appointing him as a guardian of his mother u/s.53 of the said Act, before the Bombay City Civil Court at Mumbai on the ground that her mother, since 1995, was showing signs of mental incapacity diagnosed as impaired cognitive functioning indicating neuro-degeneration of the brain suggestive of the disease known as Advanced Dementia most like Alzheimer''s disease. In support of this contention, the Respondent has placed on record before the Trial Court the certificate dated 23.02.2015 issued by the Grant Medical College and Sir J.J.Group of Hospitals, Mumbai. The Respondent also placed on record other documents. In support of his contention, the Respondent has specifically stated in the said petition, that it is necessary in the interest of justice to declare and appoint the Petitioner as a guardian in respect of the person and properties of Ms.Jessica. Some of the relevant paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 14, 21, 30 of the said petition are as under:
"3. The Petitioner states that Mrs.Jessica Lukmani (hereinafter for the sake of brevity be referred to as the said "Mother - Mrs.Jessica") has soon thereafter from the year 1995 shown signs of mental incapacity diagnosed as impaired cognitive functioning with significant impairment in memory and executive functioning indicating neuro-degeneration of the brain suggestive of the disease known as Advanced Dementia most like Alzheimer''s disease. The Petitioner ''states that the disease was treated initially by the General Phys
Byram Pestonji Gariwala vs. Union Bank of India & Ors.
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag and Ors. vs. Mr.Katiji
Gurdit Singh & Ors. vs. Munsha Singh & Ors.
Sardar Amarjit Singh Kalra (dead) by Lrs. and Ors. vs. Pramod Gupta (Smt) (Dead) by LRs. and Ors.
Smt.Phool Rani & Ors. vs. Naubat Rai Ahluwalia
State of Punjab & Ors. vs. Gurdev Singh
Thansingh Nathmal & Ors. vs. Superintendent of Taxes, Dhubri & Ors.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.