PRASANNA B.VARALE, S.M.MODAK
Sandip Baburao Waidande – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.M. MODAK, J.
1. Issue involved in this appeal is whether the link in between the incident of murder and the accused is established on the basis of proved circumstances? The case is based on circumstantial evidence. The case falls within narrow compass. Even though the circumstances relied upon by the prosecution are not too many, we have to ascertain whether they are proved and whether guilt of the accused is established.
2. Law does not require a particular number of circumstance so as to establish the chain. It altogether depends upon the nature of the transaction. In a particular case there may be few circumstances which are strong enough which leads to guilt of the accused. There may be more circumstances which may be relied upon by the prosecution. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In the case before us, there were few circumstances relied upon by the prosecution. The Additional Sessions Judge District, Sangli was pleased to believe those circumstances and draw an inference about guilt of the accused for committing murder of his own wife Nirmala. He decided the case as per the judgment dated 2.2.2018. There was conviction under section 302 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.