S. J. KATHAWALLA, MILIND JADHAV
Mariyayi Macchimaar Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit – Appellant
Versus
Department of Fisheries, Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Per S.J. Kathawalla & Milind Jadhav, JJ.
INDEX
FACTUAL BACKGROUND…………………………………………06 APPOINTMENT OF THE AMICUS CURIAE AND THE HEARING OF 3RD JULY, 2021 ………………………………………………………...08
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION ……………………………………….09 SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES ON ISSUE (i) : Whether the Petitioner can prove that the Project Affected Fishermen have a customary right to fish for a living in Thane Creek ?…………………………………………….…..10 Petitioner …………………………………………………………….10 Respondent No. 8 and Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 …………………………….………10 Amicus Curiae………………………………………………………………….……..11 SUBMISSIONS ON ISSUE (ii) – Whether TCB III is likely to detrimentally affect the practice of customary rights ?……………………………………….…………….14 Petitioner ………………………………………………………………………….…..14 Respondent No. 8……………………………………………………………………..15
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 …………………………………………………………… .. 15
FINDING ON ISSUE (i)…………………………………………………………….20
FINDING ON ISSUE (iii)………………………………………………….……….40
FACTORS AND CRITERIA FOR FORMULATING A COMPREHENSIVE
COMPENSATION POLICY……………………………………………………….41
Amicus Curiae………………………………………………………… .. 16
SUBMISSIONS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.