SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Babasaheb Poul – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith.
2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure takes exception to the order dated 1st September, 2021 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai denying the right of audience to the complainant-petitioner, in an application moved by the respondent no.2-accused seeking defreezing of her Mutual Fund Folios and Demat Account in Case No.326/PW/2017. Grievance is that, by impugned order dated 1st September, 2021, the learned Magistrate not only deprived the complainant, of her right to be heard, but also subjected her to cost, without any powers therefor in the Code of Criminal Procedure.
3. Facts essential for the decision of this petition are as under :
Petitioner is a Executive Accounts Officer, of M/s. Ravissant Private Limited (“Company” for short) engaged in the manufacturing and sale of silver and silver plated gift articles and fashionware. Respondent no.2 (accused) being the Senior Store Manager, was responsible for the receipt of company’s stock, maintaining its recor
State Bank of India V/s. Rajendra Kumar Singh and Ors.
Basappa Durgappa Kurubar & Ors. V/s. State of Karnataka & Anr.
Baba Abdul Khan S/o. Daulat Khan & Ors. V/s. Smt. A.D. Sawant, J.M.F.C. Nagpur & Ors.
Shamrao Sampatrai Khanderai V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. 1979 CrLJ 1457
J.K. International V/s. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.