SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 973

PRASANNA B.VARALE, S.M.MODAK
Janardan @ Shankar Tukaram Baing – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Payoshi Roy, Advocate, Chandani Chawla, Advocate, Yug Mohit Chaudhry, Advocate, H.J. Dedhia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prasanna B. Varale, J. - Being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2011, dated 28th February, 2012, whereby Appellant herein was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code (for short "IPC"), the present criminal appeal is preferred by the Appellant - Accused.

2. The case of prosecution is reflected through the first information report lodged at the instance of Jagannath Dhaku Baing (PW 1). Informant - Jagannath (PW 1) is resident of Tervan, Baingwadi, Tq. Rajapur with his family members namely, his mother Sarasvati, father Dhaku Dharmaji Baing, wife Jyotsana, and sons Suraj, Saurabh and Sahil. Jagannath (PW 1). He is serving in Mumbai and frequently visiting to his native place situated at Baingwadi. His aunt Kashibai is his next door neigbour and she resides with her daughter Shalini. Son of Kashibai namely, Prakash Bhalchandra Baing is also serving at Mumbai and stays at Mumbai with his family. The cousin brother Anant Baing is neighbour of Kashibai and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top