SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 834

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE, B.U.DEBADWAR
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Bhaskar Tukaram Kamble – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.D. Sanap, Advocate, S.P. Salgar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE,J. - By this appeal under Section 378(2)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), the State seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 13.11.2002 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial No.42/1999, vide which, all the ten accused have been acquitted from the charge of having committed offences punishable under Sections 302 , 307, 325, 326, 147, 148 and 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and Section 135 of the BOMBAY POLICE ACT , 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1951 Act").

2. Out of the ten accused, accused No.1 (Bhaskar Tukaram Kamble) and accused No.10 (Antakalabai w/o Gyanoji Kamble) have passed away during the pendency of the case before the Trial Court. The trial, therefore, abated as regards these two deceased accused. During the pendency of this appeal, accused No.6/ Gyanoji has passed away on 27.11.2007 and accused No.8 Vinod has passed away on 25.05.2015. This Appeal against acquittal, therefore, abates against accused No.6/ Gyanoji and accused No.8/ Vinod.

3. The prosecution had put forth it's case before the Trial Court as under :-

(a) The first informant -Deorao Amruta Gaikwad (PW-1) lodged a c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top