SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1055

SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Jagannath More – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Mahadu Bhagvat – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Milind M Sathaye, Advocate, Shriram S Kulkarni, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sandeep K Shinde, J. - Rule.

2. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard. finally with the consent of the parties.

3. Petitioners-Landlords are decree holders. Their Civil Miscellaneous Application No.184 / 2018, seeking for corrections in the decree was rejected on 12th July, 2019 by learned District Judge - I, Nashik. Against this order, Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred.

4. Briefly stated Petitioners' case is;

Petitioners-Landlords sought decree to recover possession of the suit property ad-measuring 5 x 3 square meters, of house no. 434 at Nashik, for their bonafide and reasonable need. Landlords alleged the tenant/ respondent, encroached upon and erected permanent structure, beyond the area of suit property. Thus alleged tenant was found occupying area ad- measuring 33.45 square meters of house no. 434, as against the 15 square meters. The bonafide need of the Landlords was upheld by the trial and Appellate Court. Civil Revision Application preferred by the tenant was dismissed. The Special Leave Petition (SLP) was also dismissed.

5. The Courts below rendered a finding, the property let out to the tenant was ad-measuring 20 x 20 square feet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top