IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.S. Shinde, N. J. Jamadar, JJ.
Sudha Bharadwaj & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
National Investigation Agency & Ors. - Respondents
Criminal Bail Application No. 1458 of 2019, 2024 of 2021, Interim Application No. 376 of 2020
Decided On : 01-12-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's jurisdiction established. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments against jurisdiction of court. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. responses to applicants' arguments. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. court observations on the filing of fir. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. specifying procedural legal points. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 7. entitlement and rights of the accused. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 8. supreme court's stance on wrongful detention. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 9. key legal rules around bail. (Para 32 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 10. cognizance and its legal implications. (Para 37 , 40) |
| 11. right to default bail on legal grounds. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 12. clarification of findings based on evidence. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 13. defenses against charges of unlawful activity. (Para 45 , 46) |
| 14. final rulings and decisions. (Para 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT
N.J. Jamadar, J. - These applications under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Code) seek enlargement of the applicants on bail under section 167(2) of the Code read with section 43-D(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ( UAPA ) in National Investigation Agency (NIA) Special Case No. 871 of 2020, arising out of frst information report, initially registered with Vishrambaug Police Station, being frst information report No.4 of 2018, on the ground that the learned Judge, who extended the period for investigation under section 43-D(2) of UAPA and took cognizance of the offences punishable under sections 120B, 121, 121(A), 124(A), 153A, 505(1)(b), 117, 23 of INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (the Penal Code) and sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of UAPA was not legally empowered to grant such extension and take cognizance.
2. Since the factual backdrop is, by and large, similar and common questions of law arise for consideration, both these applications are determined by this common judgment and order.
3. The background facts leading to these applications can be summarized as under:
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION No. 2024 OF 2021:-
Tushar Ramesh Damgude lodged a report on 8th January, 2018 with Vishrambaug Police Station in connection with a programme organized under the banner "Elgar Parishad" at Shanivar Wada, Pune on 31st December, 2017 alleging commission of the offences punishable under sections 153A, 505(1)(b), 117 read with 34 of the Penal Code. On 6th March, 2018 an offence punishable under section 120B of the Penal Code came to be added. During the course of investigation, searches were conducted at various places. On 17th May, 2018 the offences punishable under sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 18-B, 20, 38, 39 and 40 of UAPA were added. On 28th August 2018, the applicant, P.Varavara Rao, Gautam Navlakha, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira were arrested by the Pune police.
4. The applicant was produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faridabad, Haryana, who granted transit remand for two days. On the very same day, a Habeas Corpus petition was fled on behalf of the applicant, being Criminal Writ Petition No. 701 of 2018 before the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The applicant was directed to be kept under house arrest under the supervision of Surajkund police. Writ Petition No. 260 of 2018 was fled by Romila Thapar & Others in the Supreme Court. By an order dated 29th August, 2018, the house arrest came to be extended till further orders. Eventually, the said writ petition came to be dismissed on 28th September, 2018. However, the interim order was continued for a period of four weeks. The bail application preferred by the applicant came to be dismissed by the Sessions Court, Pune, on 26th October, 2018.
5. On 27th October, 2018, the applicant was taken into custody by Pune police. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune (Shri K.D. Vadane), before whom the applicant was produced, remanded the applicant to police custody for ten days.
6. On 22nd November, 2018 the Public Prosecutor fled a report (Exh.33) seeking extension of pe
Ashwani Kumar Singh vs. U.P. Public Service Commission and Ors. (2003) 11 SCC 584
Babu Verghese and Others vs. Bar Council of Kerala and Others
Bahadur Kora vs. State of Bihar 2015 CrLJ 2134
Bikramjit Singh vs. State of Punjab
Chief Justice Of Andhra Pradesh And Others vs. L. vs. A. Dixitulu And Others AIR 1979 SC 193 at 198
Deep Chand vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1961 SC 1527
Fatema Bibi Ahmed Patel vs. State of Gujarat & Anr. (2008) 6 SCC 789
Lord Roche in Nazir Ahmad vs. King Emperor
M. Ravindran vs. The Intelligence Offcer
Moly & Anr. vs. State of Kerala AIR 2004 SC 1890
of State of Tamil Nadu vs. Paramasiva Pandian (2002) 1 SCC 15
Punjab vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar and Ors. (2011) 14 SCC 770
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh vs. State of V.P.
Rattiram and Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2012) 4 SCC 516
Sanjay Dutt vs. State through C.B.I. Bombay II (1994) 5 SCC 410
Shrisht Dhawan Smt. vs. M/s. Shaw Brothers (1992) 1 SCC 534
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bhooraji AIR 2001 SC 3372
State of U.P. vs. Singhara Singh AIR 1964 SC 358
State through Central Bureau of Investigation
Union of India & Ors. vs. Dhanwanti Devi and Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 44
Vidyadharan vs. State of Kerala (2004) 1 SCC 215
Zuari Cement Limited vs. Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.