BHARATI H.DANGRE
Kusum w/o Arvind Dhole – Appellant
Versus
Malti w/o Suresh Dhole – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners, being aggrieved by orders passed by the Jt.Civil Judge, Sr.Division Sangamner below Exhs.23 and 28 in the execution proceedings and it is prayed that the order is (Darkhast No.64/2015) is non-est, since what is executable is a final decree and not a preliminary decree. This is the precise ground on which the writ petition is filed.
2. Heard the learned counsel Shri.S.S.Dixit for the petitioners and learned counsel Shri.K.N.Shermale for the respondents.
In order to appreciate the bone of contention between the parties, brief facts involved chronologically need a mention.
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 filed Regular Civil Suit No.212/2012 against the petitioners and respondent Nos. 4 to 9 for partition and injunction. The suit came to be decreed on 16/02/2015, declaring that plaintiffs and respondent Nos. 1 to 6 have 1/2 share in the suit property. It was further directed that since the suit property was a house property, after appointing a commissioner, the partition shall be effected as per the share determined in the judgment. As far as mesne profit is concerned, an enquiry was directed to be initiated. The judgment dated 16/02/2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.