IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S.Chandurkar, G.A.Sanap, JJ.
Anushka Sambhaji Patil - Appellant
Versus
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 2926 of 2022
Decided On : 29-04-2022
Education - Admission Dispute - Right Of Children To Free And Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Sec. 15 - [JNVST-2021] - [Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009] - The court held that the denial of admission to the petitioners despite passing the Class-V examination and clearing the qualifying test under JNVST-2021 was unjustified. The respondents' action in denying admission to the petitioners by ignoring the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009 and taking a hyper-technical view of the matter was not legally justified. The petitioners were entitled to the relief as claimed by them.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought admission in Class-VI at a school conducted by the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti. Despite passing the eligibility test, their admission was cancelled due to alleged deficiencies in documents. The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of their admission.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the denial of admission to the petitioners was unjustified and not supported by the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009. The respondents' pedantic approach in interpreting Clause-4.3 of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme was deemed unreasonable, and the petitioners were held eligible for admission to Class-VI for the academic year 2021-22.
Issues: The main issue was whether the denial of admission to the petitioners was justified under Clause-4.3 of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme and Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the denial of admission to the petitioners was not legally justified as it ignored the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009, which guarantees the right to free and compulsory education. The respondents' hyper-technical view of the matter and failure to consider the pandemic situation prevailing during the academic year 2020-21 were deemed unreasonable.
Final Decision: The court set aside the communication cancelling the petitioners' admission and directed the respondents to ensure the petitioners' admission to Class-VI for the academic year 2021-22, emphasizing the petitioners' right to education under the Act of 2009.
JUDGMENT
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners are young students who have been deprived of education in the academic year 2021-22 despite having passed the eligibility test for admission to Class-VI as according to Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya-respondent No.3, the petitioners have failed to substantiate their claim of having undertaken one year study during 2020-21 in Class-V in a recognised school in Ratnagiri district. By this writ petition the petitioners pray that they be granted admission in Class-VI at the respondent No.3-School for the academic session 2021-22 by setting aside the order dtd. 25/03/2022 cancelling their admission which was earlier granted.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that they have pursued education in Class-V in the academic session 2020-21 in various schools in Ratnagiri district. They sought admission in Class-VI at the respondent No.3-School which is conducted by the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, an autonomous organization. The petitioners appeared for the JNVST-2021 results of which were declared on 28/09/2021. The petitioners' names were shown in the list of eligible candidates published by the respondent No.2. Thereafter the petitioners through their parents took steps to submit all necessary documents from 08/10/2021 onwards through Online mode. The petitioners duly submitted the admission form along with a certificate issued by the School from which they passed the Class-V examination in April 2021. The date on which these petitioners were admitted in that School was also mentioned in the said certificate. However on 26/11/2021 the Principal of the respondent No.3-School informed the guardian of each petitioner that in view of Clause 4.3 of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme which refers to the prospectus for admission to Class-VI, each petitioner was not eligible. The deficiency in their documents was stated to be absence of date on which each petitioner was admitted to Class-V. The petitioners along with some other students who were similarly situated challenged the aforesaid communication by filing Writ Petition No.9451/2021 (Harshvardhan S. Kubade and Ors. vs. The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti and Ors.). This Court on 23/12/2021 accepted the statement made on behalf of the respondents therein that the impugned orders would be withdrawn and a fresh order considering the request for grant of admission in Class-VI would be passed in accordance with law. The petitioners were also permitted to cure the deficiencies if any in the documents submitted by them within a period of ten days from communication of such deficiencies. With these directions the aforesaid writ petition was disposed of.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that despite these directions the respondents without giving notice of ten days to the petitioners for curing the deficiencies, issued a notice of hearing on 29/12/2021 stating therein that the parents of the petitioners could meet the Principal of respondent No.3 School on 31/12/2021 with documents to substantiate the claim that each petitioner had completed one year study during the academic year 2020-21 in a recognized School in Ratnagiri district. Since this notice was received through e-mail, the petitioners' parents also submitted their replies through e-mail. As no decision was taken with regard to petitioners' admission to Class-VI, the petitioners have filed this writ petition on 14/03/2022. While issuing notice in the writ petition on 15/03/2022 the respondents were permitted to take an appropriate decision in accordance with law as regards admission of the petitioners. Thereafter on 25/03/2022 the respondent No.3-School informed the petitioners that there was no document submitted on behalf of the petitioners to substantiate their claim of completion of "one whole year's study" in Class-V in a recognized school in Ratnagiri district during 2020-21. It was further stated that it had been verified that the conc
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the denial of admission to the petitioners was unjustified and not supported by the provisions of Sec. 15 of the Act of 2009, which guarantees....
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 guarantees every child's right to education, and administrative decisions regarding admission must be based on clear and justifiable g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that false information provided in the admission forms was not deliberately given to get any undeserved benefits, rather it was given either by the....
Altering admission criteria during an ongoing selection process violates established principles of fairness and Article 16 rights, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to initially published rules.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of reservation to Other Backward Classes (OBC) candidates in Central Educational Institutions, as provided under the Central Educ....
The obligation of the Government to provide equal opportunity to all its citizens for education and admission to educational institutions, ensuring fairness and equality in educational policies.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.