N. R. BORKAR, NITIN JAMDAR
ICICI Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Nitin Jamdar, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. The Respondents waive service. The Petitions have been argued together and are disposed of by the common judgment.
2. The Petitions are filed to quash the FIR EOW C.R.No. 71 of 2021 arising out of C.R. No. 246 of 2021 filed by Respondent No.2 and the summons issued by the EOW.
3. In Writ Petition No. 2778 of 2021, Petitioner No.1 - ICICI Bank Limited is a Public Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and Banking Company within the meaning of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioner No.2 – Ms. Zarin Daruwala worked with Petitioner No.1 as President. Petitioner No.3 – Girish Nayak was working with Petitioner No.1 as General Manager and Head of Corporate Banking Group. Petitioner No.4 – Arati Ramakrishnan was employed with Petitioner No.1 as Deputy General Manager. Petitioner No.5 – Vipul Parmar was working Petitioner No.1 as an Assistant Relationship Manager from June 2010 onwards. Petitioner No.6 – Kunjal Jadhav worked with Petitioner No.1 as Relationship Manager. Petitioner No.7 – Neha Badlani joined Petitioner No.1 in Strategic Solutions Group as a Relationship Manager.
4. In Writ Petition No. 3018
State of Haryana and Ors. Vs. Bhajan Lal and Ors. 1992 Supp1 SCC 335
M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. AIR 2021 SC 1918
All Cargo Movers (India) Private Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain
Salimbhai Hamidbhai Memon Vs. Niteshkumar Maganbhai Patel & Anr. AIR 2021 SC 4404
Kishan Singh through the Legal Representative Vs. Gurpal Singh & Ors. 2008 SCC 775
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.