SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1107

DIPANKAR DATTA, M. S. KARNIK, N. J. JAMADAR
Jalgaon Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax Nodal 9, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajiv Narula a/w Ms. Mehek Choudhary i/b. Jhangiani Narula and Associates, Mr. Shakib Dhorajiwala a/w Mr. Rushab Chopra i/b. Vidhi Partners, Mr. Venkatesh Dhond-Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sawant, Mr. Murlidhar Kale, Ms. Garima Joshi, Ms. Juhi Bhogle, Ms Vinodini Shrinivasan Mr Pratik Pansare i/b. OM Gujar Law Chambers, Mr. Ranbir Singh a/w Mr. Nahush Shah i/b. Nahush Shah, Dr. Birendra Saraf-Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Vaibhav Charalwar a/w Mr. Sachin Chandarana a/w Mr. Vijayendra Purohit i/b M/s. Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co., Mr. Nitin Deshpande, Mr. J. P. Sen, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Nikhil Rajani, Mr. Apoorva Kulkarni, Mr. Rupak Sawangikar i/b. M/s. V. Deshpande and co, Mr. Charles De’Souza a/w. Mr. Nikhil Rajani, Mr. Apoorva Kulkarni, Mr Rupak Sawangikar i/b. M/s. V. Deshpande and Co., Mr. Nikhil Rajani a/w Mr. Apoorva Kulkarni a/w Mr. Rupak Sawangikar i/b M/s. V. Deshpande and Co, Mr. Charles De Souza a/w Priyansh Jain i/b. M/s. Apex Law Partners,
For the Respondent: Mr. Karan Adik i/b Mr. Padmakar S. Patkar, Mr. D. P. Singh, Ms. Naira Jeejeebhoy, Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, Mr. V. A. Sonpal, Ms. Jyoti Chavan, Mr. Mohamedali M. Chunawala a/w Mr Parshuram S. Gujar i/b. A.A. Ansari, Mr. Rakesh L. Singh a/w. Heena Shaikh i/b. M. V. Kini and Co., Mr P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. B.V. Samant, Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mr. M.M. Pable, Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction and powers of the high court. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. discussion on the sarfaesi and rddb acts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. legal interpretation of priority provisions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. constitutional validity and applicability of laws. (Para 14 , 16)
5. rights of secured creditors versus state dues. (Para 18 , 37)
6. mechanism of registrations and enforcement. (Para 150 , 151)
7. judgment on prioritized claims and outcomes. (Para 192 , 240)

JUDGMENT:

INTRODUCTION

1. A Division Bench of this Court (cor. Chief Justice and M.S. Karnik, J.) while considering this batch of writ petitions was of the view that the issues emerging for decision therein can be advantageously heard and disposed of by a larger Bench. In deference to the order dated 25th November 2021 passed by such Bench and in exercise of power conferred on the Chief Justice by rule 8 of Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, this larger Bench was constituted. The parties were put on notice and heard at length on multiple legal and factual issues.

2. The controversy lies in a narrow compass, with the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security interes

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                    whatsapp-icon Back to top