JUDGMENT :

G.S. Patel J :

1. The Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 (“the Arbitration Act”) is directed against an order of 13th March 2015 by which the learned Single Judge (AA Sayed J, as he then was) disposed of three arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act filed by the present Respondent. There were three arbitration petitions because there was an award dated 12th March 2009, a supplementary final award dated 24th February 2010 and a further award dated 21st September 2011.

2. The results of the impugned order are compactly set out in paragraph 47 at pages 125 & 126, thus:

“47. The upshot of the above discussion is as follows:

(1) The findings of the Arbitral Tribunal on Limitation are not disturbed;

(2) The findings of the Arbitral Tribunal on Repairs are set aside;

(3) Since the claim for Accident Repairs is given up by the Respondent, the challenge to the same does not survive for consideration;

(4) The findings of the Arbitral Tribunal on ‘Monthly Stipend’ are not interfered;

(5) Interest at the rate of 9% p.a. as granted by the Award dated 12 March 2009 on the amount payable by the Petitioner to the Respondent from the date of