R. D. DHANUKA, M. M. SATHAYE
Maruti Ganu Supnekar (Since Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for writ of mandamus for holding and declaring that Petitioners are entitled for a residential plot and alternate land from the benefited zone of Mahind Pond (Talav) project. Petitioners have also prayed writ of mandamus against respondents to issue notice under section 16(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999.
2. It is an admitted position that petitioners’ lands had been acquired by the State Government since the same were submerged under the Mahind Pond (Talav) project in the year 1996-99. The Special Land Acquisition Officer issued notice under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act and after following procedure, acquired the land. After making an Award, the Special Acquisition Officer issued notice under Section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to the Petitioners for receiving payment of compensation, sometime in the year 2000.
3. The case of the petitioners now is that since no notice under Section 16(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 for deposit of 65% of the amount
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.