Back
DIPANKAR DATTA, MADHAV J. JAMDAR
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Chandrakant Gosavi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Madhav J. Jamdar, J.]
1. The petitioners, original respondent nos. 1 to 3 before the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai (hereafter “Tribunal” for short), by the present writ petition are challenging the legality and validity of judgment and order dated 5th February 2021 in Review Application No.2 to 2020, order dated 10th December 2019 in Miscellaneous Application No.329 of 2019 and judgment and order dated 18th February 2019 in Original Application no.434 of 2014, all passed by the Tribunal.
2. The respondent no.1 was appointed on contractual basis for 11 months as Craft Instructor at Yavatmal. She was thereafter appointed for further 11 months on contractual basis at Industrial Training Institute (hereafter “ITI”, for short) Dongri, District Thane by an appointment letter dated 2nd March 2010. Respondent no.1 applied under the regular selection process and after qualifying in the said selection process, she was appointed on regular basis as a Craft Instructor (Craft Instructor Electrician) at ITI, Vikramgad, Thane by an appointment letter dated 3rd Sep
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the resignation was voluntary, the sexual harassment complaint lacked nexus with the resignation, and the acceptance of the resignation severe....
An employee's application for voluntary retirement is effective if not refused, and resignation cannot be accepted retroactively without following proper procedures.
Non-communication of acceptance of resignation does not invalidate the resignation, and the resignation becomes effective on its acceptance, even if the acceptance is not communicated, as long as the....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the acceptance of an employee's resignation within a specified period is mandatory under Rule 114A of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a teacher's resignation should be made voluntarily, and if the employee withdraws such resignation, it is duly entitled to do so.
A resignation cannot be withdrawn after its acceptance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a government servant can withdraw their resignation before its acceptance, as provided under Rule 7 of the Uttar Pradesh Government Servants R....
Resignation with immediate effect by railway servant cannot be rejected on staff shortage grounds under IREC Rule 302 absent pending disciplinary proceedings; employer cannot force continuance or ini....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
