JUDGMENT :

Heard learned advocate Mr.Anand Sharma for learned advocate Mr.Prateek Bhatia for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Akshat Khare for learned advocate Mrs.Suman Khare for the respondent No.1.

1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :

“9. The petitioner respectfully prays that, on the basis of the facts and circumstances as mentioned hereinabove and which may be urged at the time of hearing, the Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent authorities and may be pleased to :

(A) quash and set aside the decision of the respondent authority of accepting the resignation of the petitioner from service, and consequently quash and set aside the office order purported to be dated 19.2.2013, whereby the petitioner is ordered to be relieved of his services from the respondent authority, Annexure-A to this petition, and

(B) quash and set aside the order of the respondent authority dated 22.2.2013 denying the r