SANDEEP V. MARNE
Dinesh Singh Bhim Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vinod Shobhraj Gajaria – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, Petition is heard finally.
2. The Petitioner/Defendant assails order dated 26 August 2022 passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Vasai, on Application below Exhibit 52 allowing the prayer of Plaintiffs/Respondents to issue witness summons.
3. The objection of the Petitioner/Defendant to the order dated 26 August 2022 is that the Respondents/Plaintiffs in the first instance had failed to file list of witnesses as mandated under Order XVI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’). Having failed to file list of witnesses under that provision, it was incumbent on the Respondents/ Plaintiffs to show sufficient cause for seeking issuance of witnesses summons to additional witnesses under the provisions of Sub-rule 3 of Rule 1 of Order XVI of CPC. It is contended that since no sufficient cause was pleaded nor shown, the trial court has erred in allowing the Application and issued summons to witnesses whose names were not included in the list of witnesses to be filed under the provisions of sub-rule 1 of Rule 1 of Order XVI of CPC
4. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner/Defendant in suppo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.