G. S. PATEL, NEELA GOKHALE
X – Appellant
Versus
Dean, Academic Affairs Director’s Office, Tata Institute of Social Sciences – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.S. PATEL, J.
1. The Petition is simple and it is clearly one supported by every recent decision of the Supreme Court regarding the rights of those who have traditionally been held to be marginalized. The decisions of the Supreme Court direct us towards greater inclusiveness and acceptance of individuality and individual traits. These are not to be compromised because of some bureaucratic requirements.
2. Prayer clauses (a) and (b) in the Petition read thus:
(b) for a writ of Mandamus or a writ, order, or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to suitably modify the form available to alumni at Alumni-Application-From-for-Transcript Feb-2022.pdf (tiss.edu) to make if flexible to include requests by alumni for change of particulars such
National Legal Services Authority vs. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.