R. D. DHANUKA, M. M. SATHAYE
Bharat J. Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.D. DHANUKA, J.
1. Rule. Mr. Abhay Patki, Learned AGP waives service on behalf of Respondent-State. Mr. Abhijeet Desai waives service on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, SRA. Mr. Cherag Balsara waives service on behalf of Respondent No. 4. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, Petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. The Petitioner filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside Notification dated 17 November, 2016, issued by the Respondent No. 1 in respect of the property bearing CTS No. 29 and 32, admeasuring about 7154.3 and 500 sq. mtrs respectively lying and situated at Village Dindoshi, Taluka Borivali, Mumbai and also prays for quashing and setting aside Public Notice dated 29 April, 2017 issued by Respondent No. 2 and all the consequent proceedings initiated by Respondent No. 2(Hereinafter referred as ‘writ property’). The Petitioner also prays for writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside consequent proceedings including but not limited to the Order dated 20 June, 2018 passed by the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
3. It is the case of the Petitioner tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.