SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 277

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, M. M. SATHAYE
Javed Ahmed Hajam – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Karim Pathan
For the Respondent: Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP

JUDGMENT :

SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

2. The petitioner is a Professor in Sanjay Ghodavat Collage. There is a whatsapp group comprising parents-teachers organization and the petitioner is a member of this whatsapp group. It is alleged that between 13.08.2022 and 15.08.2022, the petitioner being a member of this whatsapp group, created whatsapp status giving two messages namely; (1) AUGUST 5 BLACK DAY JAMMU & KASHMIR and (2) 14th August Happy Independence Day Pakistan. It is further alleged that below the first message displayed as status of the petitioner on whatsapp application in petitioner’s handset was written “Article 370 was abrogated, we are not happy”. On the basis of these allegations, Hatkanangale Police Station, Kolhapur registered an offence punishable under Section 153-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that here is the case where the petitioner has not circulated any derogatory message much less any message with the intention of promoting enmity between different groups on gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top