ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Pundlik S/o. Tulashiram Sapkale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The Petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 12.01.2023, passed by the learned Collector, Jalgaon in Dispute Application No. 66 of 2022, wherein the Petitioner - Sarpanch of village Kanalda was disqualified under Section 36 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 for not holding the monthly meeting for the month of October 2021.
2. Heard Mr. Jitendra V. Patil, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. N.T. Bhagat, learned AGP for Respondent/State, Mr. Atmaram J. Patil, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.3 to 5 and 17 and Mr. D.P. Palodkar holding for Mr. Paresh B. Patil (Borse), learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.6 to 16.
3. Brief facts leading to the filing of the petition can be summarized as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.