VIBHA KANKANWADI, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Sikandar Baig Amin Baig – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER :
Y.G. Khobragade, J.
1. Appeal No.131 of 2020 is filed by the State seeking leave to file appeal under Section 378(1) (b) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 09.12.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No. 141/2015 for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 307, 326, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 149 of the I.P.C. and prayed for taking action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. against accused/respondents.
2. Criminal Appeal No.276 of 2020 is instituted by the victim-informant under Section 378 read with Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. challenging the judgment and order of acquittal of the respondents-accused delivered on 09.12.2019 in Sessions Case No.141/2015 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, whereby, the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the respondents-accused for the offences punishable under Section 147, 148, 307, 326, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 149 of the I.P.C.
3. Since in both these appeals are challenging order of acquittal, therefore, both these appeals are being decided together at the stage of admission itself.
4. Heard Smt. V.S.Choudhari the learned APP for the State a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.