SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 594

VIBHA KANKANWADI, S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Dilip S/o Sambhaji Gajbhare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : M.A. Tandale.
For the Respondent: V.S. Choudhari.

JUDGMENT :

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J.

1. Present appeal has been filed by the original accused challenging his conviction by the learned Special Judge, under the POCSO Act/Sessions Judge, Nanded in Special Case No. 35 of 2014 dated 16.05.2016, whereby the accused was held guilty of committing offence punishable under Section 376(1) of Indian Penal Code and Section 5(m) punishable under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the “POCSO Act”).

2. The prosecution story in short is that informant is the mother of the victim. Victim was aged 6 years and she has one sister and brother aged 3 and 1 years respectively. The father of the victim was a labour. The grandmother (mother’s mother) of the victim resides adjacent to the house of the victim. Accused resides behind the house of the victim and the informant used to go to his house for fetching drinking water.

3. The prosecution story further is that the informant lodged report with Kinwat Police Station, District Nanded on 09.09.2014 disclosing that she had gone to the weekly Bazar around 2.00 p.m. on 08.09.2014. The children were at home. After purchasing necessary articles, she came

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top