SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1994

ABHAY AHUJA
Shamrao Rambhau Konde – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sanjukta Dey, Advocate, Sagar Paspohe, Advocate, A.B.Kadam, Advocate, Manoj Patil, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. For the reasons to be recorded separately, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

2. Set forth hereunder are the reasons.

3. By this Petition fled under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Petitioners are challenging the impugned order dtd. 8/3/2021, passed by Respondent No.2 Presiding Offcer, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune in Revision Application No.P/II/7/2021 under Sec. 13(4) of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Rules, 2013, rejecting the said Revision Application.

4. Petitioners are the legal heirs of the original tenant of the land bearing Survey Nos.99/1, 99/3, admeasuring 5 Acres 33 Gunthas of Village Arvi, Tanajinagar, Taluka Haveli, District Pune (for short 'the said land'). Respondent No.1 is the State of Maharashtra through its Department of Revenue, Respondent No. 2 is the Revenue Tribunal, Respondent No.3 is the SDO, Haveli, Respondent No. 4 is the Tahsildar, Haveli and having jurisdiction over the said land as per the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (the 'MLRC') and the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (for short 'the Tenancy Act'). Respondents No. 5 to 7 are the original Respondents in Revision Application No.P/I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top