Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Late Kashinath Shivram Bharati alias Gosavi through his Legal Heirs – Appellant
Versus
Laxman Gyanba Bharati alias Giri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. concurrent lower authority rejection of tenancy claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. widow inherits lands; adopts one brother. (Para 3 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. brother not family; protected under 4a; 32f inapplicable. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. family cultivation bars tenancy; 32f mandatory for widow. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. article 227 limits review absent perversity. (Para 11 , 27) |
| 6. dispute triggered 1993; initial alt order remanded. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. no tiller's day cultivation evidence for kashinath. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 8. section 4 deems tenant excluding family members. (Para 20) |
| 9. bai pirojabai precedent fact-specific, inapplicable here. (Para 21) |
| 10. widow's brother cultivation is family aid, not tenancy. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 11. section 32f bars tenant purchase from widow. (Para 25) |
| 12. tenancy rejected for evidence lack and family tie. (Para 26) |
| 13. petition dismissed; stay extended eight weeks. (Para 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. By this Petition, Petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 30 December 2019 passed by the learned Member (Judicial), Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune, (MRT) dismissing their Revision Application and confirming the order passed by the
Brother cultivating widowed sister's land is family member under Section 4(1)(a), not deemed tenant without proof of tenancy; widow's retained lands protected under Section 32F. Concurrent findings u....
Brother cultivating widow's land is 'member of owner's family' under tenancy law Section 4(1)(a), excluding deemed tenancy absent tenancy proof; Section 32F protects widow's retained lands from tenan....
Lawful cultivation establishes deemed tenancy status under the Maharashtra Tenancy Act, irrespective of documentary evidence like rent receipts.
Lawful cultivation is essential for deemed tenancy under Section 4(1) of the Tenancy Act; mere possession does not confer tenancy rights.
Challenging decisions within a reasonable time is crucial, and delay may render claims unsustainable.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement for tenants to send intimation of purchase to the landlord within the prescribed period after the death of the landlad....
Statutory titles established under tenancy laws are binding and preclude claims for partition unless substantial evidence supports joint ownership, failing which civil court jurisdiction is ousted.
Tenancy rights cannot be terminated without due process under the Tenancy Act, and any mutation affecting such rights must follow proper notice procedures.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
