SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Ravindra V. Ghuge, Arun R. Pedneker, JJ.
Madanlal Zumberlal Nahar & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Chief Officer Municipal Council Beed Tal & Dist & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2260 of 2010 And Writ Petition No. 4232 of 2008
Decided On : 28-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S. S. Bora, for the Appellant; Mr. G. K. Naik Thigale, Mr. A. R. Kale, for the Respondent

Headnote:

Reservation - Land Development - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 31, 38, 126, 127 - The court examined the validity of reservation of the Petitioners' land and the issuance of purchase notices under Section 127 of the 1966 Act. The court considered the relevant provisions and previous judgments to determine the lapsing of reservation and the rights of the landowner. The court referred the matter to a larger bench to consider the issue of declaring lands free from reservation in absence of a valid notice under Section 127 of the 1966 Act.

Fact of the Case:

The Petitioners sought a declaration that the reservation of their land for a public purpose under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 had lapsed and that the land should be declared free for development. The Petitioners issued purchase notices under Section 127 of the 1966 Act after the revised development plan came into force.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the purchase notices were premature and invalid as they were issued within 10 years of the revised development plan. The court also held that in absence of a valid notice under Section 127, there was no lapsing of reservation. The court referred the matter to a larger bench to consider the issue of declaring lands free from reservation in absence of a valid notice under Section 127 of the 1966 Act.

Issues: The court considered the validity of the purchase notices under Section 127 of the 1966 Act and the lapsing of reservation. The court also raised the issue of the court's authority to declare lands free from reservation in absence of a valid notice under Section 127.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the purchase notices were premature and invalid, and there was no lapsing of reservation. The court referred the matter to a larger bench to consider the issue of declaring lands free from reservation in absence of a valid notice under Section 127 of the 1966 Act.

Final Decision: The court referred the matter to a larger bench to consider the issue of declaring lands free from reservation in absence of a valid notice under Section 127 of the 1966 Act.

JUDGMENT

Arun R. Pedneker, J. - Present Writ Petitions are filed for a declaration that the reservation of the Petitioners' land of 0.74 Hector in District Beed, Maharashtra, for a public purpose under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred as 1966 Act') has lapsed and that the reserved land should be declared free for development.

2. The Petitioners in the Writ Petitions pray for the following reliefs:-

    ''c. By issuing a writ order of direction under Art. 226 of the constitution of India it be held and declared that, the reservation of the Survey no.87 at Taraf Giram in Beed to the extent of 74 R. owned by the petitioners in the development plan of Municipal council Beed has lapsed and the said land is released from the reservation and the land will be available to the petitioners for development.

    d. Pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Writ petition the respondent authorities be restrained for acquiring the land of the petitioner to the extent of 74 R. situated at Taraf Giram, Beed for any development purpose.''

    3. Heard Mr. S. S. Bora for the Petitioners, Mr. A. R. Kale, AGP for the Respondent/State and Mr. G. K. Naik Thigale, for the Respondent No.1, Municipal Council, Beed.

    4. Facts leading to the filing of Writ Petitions can be summarized as under:-

      A. The development plan under the 1966 ACt of District Beed, State of Maharashtra was sanctioned vide Urban Development Department and Public Health Department Notification No. TPS-3373/52859/W-II-(b) dated 23.06.1975 and came into force from 16.08.1975. In the said development plan, the Petitioners land from Survey No.87 Taraf Giram (area of 2 Acres and 11 Gunthas i.e. 0.92 Hectors) was reserved for 'Post and Telegraph Department', bearing Site No.17.

      B. The development plan of Beed was revised and sanctioned by the State Government through it's Urban Development Department vide Notification No. TPS-3396/CR-180/96/UD-9 dated 08.09.1997 and came into force with effect from 15.10.1997. Certain portion of the excluded part of the earlier development plan was sanctioned vide Government Notification No. TPS-339/608/Cr-82(A)/99/UD-30, dated 10.05.2001. In the revised development plan (excluded part) dated 10.05.2001, the Petitioners land was reserved for 'Postal Department Quarter', as Site No.2 by reducing the area from 0.92 Hector to 0.74 Hector. The said revised development plan (excluded part) came into force from 01.07.2001.

      C. The Petitioners served purchase notice dated 29.06.2006 on the planning authority and also on the development authority under Section 127 of the 1966 Act. As no steps were taken by the authorites to acquire the reserved land within the stipulated period, the Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.4232 of 2008 for above mentioned reliefs. The Petitioners, thereafter, served another purchase notice under Section 127 of the 1966 Act on 17.03.2009. On completion of period mentioned in the purchase notice and as no steps were taken by the authorities to acquire the reserved land within the stipulated period, the Petitioners filed Writ Petition No.2260 of 2010 for the same reliefs mentioned above.

      5. In the factual background above, the learned Counsel for Petitioners Mr. Bora, submits that the final development plan for Beed came into existence w.e.f. 16.08.1975 and the Petitioners land to the extent of 0.74 Hector continued to be under reservation for different public purposes for more than 47 years and the Petitioners have issued purchase notices under Section 127 of the 1966 Act. However, no steps for acquisition are taken till date by the Respondents/Authorities and thus the land be declared to be free from reservation and the Petitioners be permitted to develop the same.

      6. Mr. Bora further submits that revised development plan (excluded part) was sanctioned on 10.05.2001 and even from this stage more than 21 years have lapsed but no steps are taken by the authorities for acquiring the Petitioners land under reserv

                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                            1
                            2
                            3
                            4
                            5
                            6
                            7
                            8
                            9
                            10
                            11
                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                            supreme today icon
                            logo-black

                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                            Please visit our Training & Support
                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                            qr

                            Scan Me!

                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                            whatsapp-icon Back to top