SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SARANG V. KOTWAL
Ramchandra Shrimant Bhandare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sushan Mhatre, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Yogesh Y. Dabke, APP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellant has challenged his conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Special Judge under POCSO Act at Greater Mumbai on 20.11.2017 in POCSO Case No.94/2014. The appellant was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, 'POCSO Act'). He was sentenced to suffer RI for five years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo RI for six months. He was granted benefit of set off under Section 428 of Cr.P.C.. The judgment mentions that the appellant was in custody from 13.12.2013 till 21.7.2014 and then was re-arrested on 26.7.2017 and was in custody till the date of the order.

2. Heard Shri Sushan Mhatre, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Yogesh Dabke, learned APP for the State.

3. The prosecution case is that on 11.12.2013 at about 1.00 p.m., the appellant approached the victim who was about five years of age on that date. He touched and pinched her private parts and thus committed offence punishable under Section 8 of POCSO Act and under Section 354 of IPC. The FIR was lodged at the midnight. The appellant wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top